Dynamic assessment of interleukin-6 during hemodialysis and mortality in coronavirus disease-19.

The impact of the newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in hemodialysis patients remains poorly characterized. Some hemodialysis techniques reduce systemic inflammation but their impact on COVID-19 has not been addressed. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate factors associated with mortality in COVID-19 hemodialysis patients, including the impact of reducing interleukin-6 using a cytokine adsorbent filter. This is a prospective single-center study including 16 hemodialysis patients with COVID-19. All were dialyzed using a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) filter. Interleukin-6 levels were obtained before and after the first admission hemodialysis session and at 1 week. Baseline comorbidities, laboratory values, chest X-ray, and treatments were recorded and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Out of 16 patients (13 males, mean age 72 ± 15 years), 4 (25%) died. Factors associated with mortality were dialysis vintage (P = 0.01), chest X-ray infiltrates (P = 0.032), serum C-reactive protein (P = 0.05), and lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.02) at 1 week, oxygen therapy requirement (P = 0.02) and anticoagulation (P < 0.01). At admission, non-survivors had higher predialysis and postdialysis interleukin-6 levels (P = 0.02 for both) and did not present the reduction of interleukin-6 levels during the dialysis session with PMMA filter that was observed in survivors (survivors vs. non-survivors: 25.0 [17.5-53.2]% vs. -2.8 [-109.4-12.8]% reduction, P = 0.04). A positive balance of interleukin-6 during the admission dialysis was associated with mortality (P = 0.008). In conclusion, in hemodialysis COVID-19 patients, a positive interleukin-6 balance during the admission hemodialysis session was associated with higher mortality.

El triacetato de celulosa asimétrico es una alternativa segura y eficaz para la hemodiafiltración en línea / Asymmetric cellulose triacetate is a safe and effective alternative for online haemodiafiltration

ANTECEDENTES: En la hemodiafiltración posdilucional se han usado solo membranas sintéticas. Ahora contamos con un triacetato de celulosa asimétrico (ATA(R)) cuyas características lo hacen apto para esta técnica. OBJETIVOS: Describir las prestaciones y el comportamiento in vivo de esta membrana estudiando la eficacia depurativa y el uso clínico, además de su biocompatibilidad aguda tras un mes de tratamiento. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo observacional en el que se incluyeron 23 pacientes que se dializaron durante 4 semanas con ATA(R) manteniendo su pauta previa. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 287 sesiones y se recogieron 264 sesiones completas. Con un tiempo efectivo de 243,7 (17,6) min y un flujo medio de sangre de 371,7 (23) ml/min, se obtuvo un Kt medio de 56,3 (5,3) l, un volumen convectivo de 27,1 (4,2) l, con una fracción de filtración del 29,9 (3,7) %, un porcentaje de reducción (RR) de urea de 81 (5,2) %, un RR de creatinina de 74,7 (4,6) %, un RR de Beta2-microglobulina de 76,5 (4,8) % y un RR de proteína transportadora de retinol de 18,6 (7,6) %. No se produjeron problemas técnicos ni alarmas. No fue preciso cambiar la dosificación de heparina. A los 30 min de la sesión no se produjo ningún aumento de C3a, C5a ni leucopenia. Tampoco se modificaron de forma significativa las poblaciones monocitarias ni la IL-Beta1 ni IL-6 tras un mes de tratamiento. CONCLUSIONES: ATA(R) logra un Kt y un volumen convectivo adecuados, sin problemas técnicos y con buen perfil de biocompatibilidad e inflamatorio, lo que lo convierte en una posibilidad más de tratamiento para hemodiafiltración posdilucional, máxime en pacientes alérgicos a membranas sintéticas

BACKGROUND: In post-dilution haemodiafiltration only synthetic membranes have been used to date. Asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA(TM)) is now available, whose characteristics are suitable for this technique. OBJECTIVES: To describe the in vivo performance and behaviour of this membrane, to identify its depurative effectiveness, use in clinical practice and its biocompatibility, both acute and after one month of treatment. METHODS: Observational prospective study of 23 patients who were dialysed for 4 weeks using an ATA(TM) membrane and who maintained their prior regimen. RESULTS: A total of 287 sessions were performed and 264 complete sessions were collected. With an effective time of 243.7 (17.6) min and a mean blood flow of 371.7 (23) ml/min, an average Kt of 56.3 (5.3) l was observed, as well as a convection volume of 27.1 (4.2) l, a filtration fraction of 29.9 (3.7) %, a urea reduction ratio (RR) of 81 (5.2) %, a creatinine RR of 74.7 (4.6) %, a Beta2-microglobulin RR of 76.5 (4.8) % and a retinol binding protein RR of 18.6 (7.6) %. There were no technical problems or alarms. Changing the heparin dosage was not necessary. No increases in C3a or C5a concentrations or leukopenia were observed in the first 30min of the session. Neither the monocyte subpopulations nor IL-Beta1 or IL-6 were significantly altered after one month of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The new ATA(TM) membrane achieves adequate Kt and convection volume, without technical problems and with good biocompatibility and inflammatory profiles. It is therefore a valid option for post-dilution haemodiafiltration, particularly in patients allergic to synthetic membranes

Asymmetric cellulose triacetate is a safe and effective alternative for online haemodiafiltration. / El triacetato de celulosa asimétrico es una alternativa segura y eficaz para la hemodiafiltración en línea.

BACKGROUND: In post-dilution haemodiafiltration only synthetic membranes have been used to date. Asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA™) is now available, whose characteristics are suitable for this technique. OBJECTIVES: To describe the in vivo performance and behaviour of this membrane, to identify its depurative effectiveness, use in clinical practice and its biocompatibility, both acute and after one month of treatment. METHODS: Observational prospective study of 23 patients who were dialysed for 4 weeks using an ATA™ membrane and who maintained their prior regimen. RESULTS: A total of 287 sessions were performed and 264 complete sessions were collected. With an effective time of 243.7 (17.6) min and a mean blood flow of 371.7 (23) ml/min, an average Kt of 56.3 (5.3) l was observed, as well as a convection volume of 27.1 (4.2) l, a filtration fraction of 29.9 (3.7) %, a urea reduction ratio (RR) of 81 (5.2) %, a creatinine RR of 74.7 (4.6) %, a ß2-microglobulin RR of 76.5 (4.8) % and a retinol binding protein RR of 18.6 (7.6) %. There were no technical problems or alarms. Changing the heparin dosage was not necessary. No increases in C3a or C5a concentrations or leukopenia were observed in the first 30min of the session. Neither the monocyte subpopulations nor IL-ß1 or IL-6 were significantly altered after one month of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The new ATA™ membrane achieves adequate Kt and convection volume, without technical problems and with good biocompatibility and inflammatory profiles. It is therefore a valid option for post-dilution haemodiafiltration, particularly in patients allergic to synthetic membranes.